Meeting 6/18/08
Attendance: Florent, Jen F, Lisha, Jenny A, Brandon, Kenji, Alan, Andrew S, Michelle S, Maxime, Andrea, Brad, Tony M, John, Andrew M, Juan, Michelle P, Tony Z
Meeting Outline
1. a) Structure of paper
b) Algorithm
c) Group selection
2. Topics
3. Due Dates
4. Poster
Structure of paper
Part 1 - Why commercial space development
Lead: Andrea (all contributions welcome)
Part 2 – Why CSD possible?
Two Possible Paths
A – Whole Business Group
B – Tech x1, Business x1
Part 3 – Roadmap
Microgroups and legal
Part 4 – Success
Two Possible Paths
A – Tech Group
B – Tech x1, Business x1
Each person will work on one large group and one microgroup. Due dates for microgroup topics (approx. 16 total topics) established, but can be changed if particularly interesting problems found.
Microgroup Topic Due Dates: June 25, July 7, July 16, July 26
Large groups: First Draft: July 9
Discussion about paths:
Cons about B: fewer microgroups, too much work for one person?
Pros for A: More minds and input, more people to
Cons for A: Too many people, hard to converge ideas
Do a combination of both? Make Parts 2 and 4 a combination of Business and Tech? Break up permanently the business and technical groups and form two new groups for parts Possibility and Success.
IDEA APPROVED
Algorithm
ID problem à look at case studies, current solutions, Academy ideas à Evaluate Pros/Cons T/B/L à separate into NASA and non-NASA
Group Assignment:
Large Group:
POSSIBLE:
Juan
Michelle P
Leader: Tony M
John
Michelle S
Kenji
SUCCESS:
Andrew M
Florent
Lisha
Brandon
Andrew S
Leader: Maxime
Prizes: Brandon, Maxime, Michelle P, Andrew S.
Microgroups:
A: Kenji, Andrea, Juan = Infrastructure
B: John Tony M. = Engaging non-Aero businesses
C: Drew Florent = Dual use tech
D: Michelle S. Lisha = NASA tech transfer
Pick Order: A, D, C, B
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.